<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: CSI Discussion &#8211; Episode 8.17 For Gedda</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/</link>
	<description>CSI news, views and gossip</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:37:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Aaron</title>
		<link>http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/comment-page-1/#comment-4560</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 17:59:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/#comment-4560</guid>
		<description>Well, eventhough I did not like to see warric to go from CSI, but it was a very good and touching way to end his character. Especially when Grissom had the last say in the funeral. 
Good job to the jerry.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, eventhough I did not like to see warric to go from CSI, but it was a very good and touching way to end his character. Especially when Grissom had the last say in the funeral.<br />
Good job to the jerry.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: S</title>
		<link>http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/comment-page-1/#comment-3085</link>
		<dc:creator>S</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 10:54:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/#comment-3085</guid>
		<description>6. Or maybe she was the one who tipped the undersheriff off that Warrick was leaving...okay, just think about it makes me sad. McKeen has GOT TO meet a horrible end!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>6. Or maybe she was the one who tipped the undersheriff off that Warrick was leaving&#8230;okay, just think about it makes me sad. McKeen has GOT TO meet a horrible end!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony</title>
		<link>http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/comment-page-1/#comment-3495</link>
		<dc:creator>tony</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 May 2008 00:58:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/#comment-3495</guid>
		<description>I think what happened to Warrick Brown was completely unnecessary but expected just as well. True, he had been framed for a murder he did not commit, drugged into believing this, then as a last resort, he is shot by the undersheriff McKeen? Clearly this is not the last that we will see of Warrick Brown. As a dedicated CSI fanatic, I feel that Warrick&#039;s absence will be realized and despite the rumors of Gary Dourdan and a reported &quot;drug problem&quot; feel that his allies will surely go out of their way to find and bring to justice the undersheriff McKeen and expose him for the &quot;mole&quot; that he surely portrays.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think what happened to Warrick Brown was completely unnecessary but expected just as well. True, he had been framed for a murder he did not commit, drugged into believing this, then as a last resort, he is shot by the undersheriff McKeen? Clearly this is not the last that we will see of Warrick Brown. As a dedicated CSI fanatic, I feel that Warrick&#8217;s absence will be realized and despite the rumors of Gary Dourdan and a reported &#8220;drug problem&#8221; feel that his allies will surely go out of their way to find and bring to justice the undersheriff McKeen and expose him for the &#8220;mole&#8221; that he surely portrays.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim</title>
		<link>http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/comment-page-1/#comment-3526</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 07:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/#comment-3526</guid>
		<description>This episode was nuts. Warrick better have miraculously survived. damn it. damn it damn it.

1. cause he was too pissed
2. weird that he knew the PI that ended up dead.. and why would he want the PI&#039;s death investigated so much if he was the killer?
3. there is a conflict of interest, so this didn&#039;t make me suspicious at all...
4. not really...
5. who knows? this is so open-ended that it could be anything... mckeen was never a big big character anyway...
6. not really...i think she was looking at nick...
7. i HOPE so... because mckeen better get got....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This episode was nuts. Warrick better have miraculously survived. damn it. damn it damn it.</p>
<p>1. cause he was too pissed<br />
2. weird that he knew the PI that ended up dead.. and why would he want the PI&#8217;s death investigated so much if he was the killer?<br />
3. there is a conflict of interest, so this didn&#8217;t make me suspicious at all&#8230;<br />
4. not really&#8230;<br />
5. who knows? this is so open-ended that it could be anything&#8230; mckeen was never a big big character anyway&#8230;<br />
6. not really&#8230;i think she was looking at nick&#8230;<br />
7. i HOPE so&#8230; because mckeen better get got&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: alice</title>
		<link>http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/comment-page-1/#comment-3194</link>
		<dc:creator>alice</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:37:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/#comment-3194</guid>
		<description>i&#039;m so sad, i loved warrick. and for 8 ****** seasons i have been waiting for a kiss between catherine and warrick and all i get is a small peck on the cheek? what&#039;s that? god, now i&#039;m so angry! it could at least be on the mouth. i really hope cath misses warrick badly next season, i need some tension between them even though they&#039;re depressed and he is dead! yo!bling forever... rip warrick brown &lt;3</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i&#8217;m so sad, i loved warrick. and for 8 ****** seasons i have been waiting for a kiss between catherine and warrick and all i get is a small peck on the cheek? what&#8217;s that? god, now i&#8217;m so angry! it could at least be on the mouth. i really hope cath misses warrick badly next season, i need some tension between them even though they&#8217;re depressed and he is dead! yo!bling forever&#8230; rip warrick brown &lt;3</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott</title>
		<link>http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/comment-page-1/#comment-3306</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 12:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.csifanatic.com/2008/05/16/csi-discussion-episode-817-for-gedda/#comment-3306</guid>
		<description>1) Answer&#039;s simple. Warrick was already clearly drugged out of his mind, and he&#039;d do ANYTHING to get back at Gedda after offing Joanna. He let his machoness do his thinking.

2) Not that I noticed, but I started to figure out pretty quick that something was gonna&#039; go down with him.

3) It might&#039;ve been, but now we ALL know why McKeane did it. Since he was the mole, he wanted the incompetent day shift there so he wouldn&#039;t be caught.

4) Yes, it did. A bit too abrupt for my liking. That&#039;s foreshadowing for you, everything rarely works out on CSI.

5) Perhaps he holds a personal vendetta for Warrick, or believed he knew too much. Maybe he&#039;s a pawn in a bigger scheme. Who knows? :O

6) Not really. But I do think something will come off with her and Nick eventually.

7) Yes, that&#039;s a brilliant plot hook you have there! I&#039;d love to see where that goes next season! ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1) Answer&#8217;s simple. Warrick was already clearly drugged out of his mind, and he&#8217;d do ANYTHING to get back at Gedda after offing Joanna. He let his machoness do his thinking.</p>
<p>2) Not that I noticed, but I started to figure out pretty quick that something was gonna&#8217; go down with him.</p>
<p>3) It might&#8217;ve been, but now we ALL know why McKeane did it. Since he was the mole, he wanted the incompetent day shift there so he wouldn&#8217;t be caught.</p>
<p>4) Yes, it did. A bit too abrupt for my liking. That&#8217;s foreshadowing for you, everything rarely works out on CSI.</p>
<p>5) Perhaps he holds a personal vendetta for Warrick, or believed he knew too much. Maybe he&#8217;s a pawn in a bigger scheme. Who knows? :O</p>
<p>6) Not really. But I do think something will come off with her and Nick eventually.</p>
<p>7) Yes, that&#8217;s a brilliant plot hook you have there! I&#8217;d love to see where that goes next season! <img src='http://www.csifanatic.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>